Following outcry from the equestrian community over the proposed horse tax, Government ministers are under pressure to reconsider the plan after 10,000 people signed a petition opposing the move, H&C has learned.

Even before the Government's draft Animal Health Bill was published yesterday afternoon, it had drawn criticism from the horse sector unhappy that the Government is pressing ahead with the plans despite overwhelming opposition from horse owners.

The BEF say that campaigners have been logging on to the 10 Downing Street website since September to have their say on the proposals, which would see every horse owner in the country hit with a 'tax in all but name' on each of their animals to help pay for a new Government agency to oversee animal health.

Yet despite Minister for the Horse Jim Fitzpatrick telling MPs last week that the Government is "keen for there to be as much scrutiny as possible", the publication of the Bill comes well before a cross-sector Advisory Group set up to examine the proposals has had a chance to have its say.

Horse owners have been highly critical of the plans since they were published last year, with many angry that the proposed new system of charges would place a heavy burden on the horse sector without offering any clear benefits to riders, breeders and trainers in return.

Critics have also pointed to the poor value for money which taxpayers would receive from such a move, arguing that any new body would spend much of its time collecting charges from people who own just a single horse; a group who make up 65 per cent of all owners.

With the administrative cost of collecting the charge almost outweighing the charge itself in these cases, an estimated £2.3m would need to be spent to collect just £4.5m, says Rethink the Horse Tax, the campaign behind the petition.

Veterinarians, too, have warned that creating a new layer of bureaucracy will complicate the process of responding to animal disease outbreaks.

Welfare groups have also joined animal keepers and vets in expressing opposition to the plans, as they artificially separate animal health and welfare.

A spokesperson for the British Horse Industry Confederation, Tim Morris, said: "The horse sector has said it will work with the government to achieve the benefits of reduced risk of disease and enhanced animal welfare. But all we are seeing the extra cost and complexity of an expensive new quango, which will be an unnecessary burden to both the taxpayer and horse owner, with none of these benefits."

"We have been assured by the Ministers that the contents of the Bill are still wide open to debate, but publishing a draft Bill without saying what it will cost and with no visible benefits make this a very hard sell to horse owners."

"The Government need only look at the response that this petition, even before horse owner saw the details, to see that there is a great deal of opposition to this Bill. The Bill in its current form is expensive and unworkable and we urge the Government to now wait until its own Advisory Group has fully considered and costed these proposals."

Find out more about the Rethink the Horse Tax campaign at the link below.