Dangerous Dogs may have to be chipped

9
Mar
2010

Dangerous Dogs may have to be chipped

Owners could be forced to microchip their pets

Dog owners could be required to insure themselves against the risk of their pet attacking someone, H&C has learnt.

Government proposals suggest forcing every dog owner to take out third party insurance and to have their dog microchipped. Ministers are also considering introducing new Dog Control Notices for misbehaving animals.

The 'Dogbo' orders would allow police officers and council officials to force miscreant owners to muzzle, leash or even neuter their pets. In extreme cases the dogs could even be confiscated and given to new owners.

The Kennel Club today welcomed the plans to review current dangerous dogs legislation.

Communications Director Caroline Kisko said “The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is a kneejerk piece of legislation which was rushed through in haste. It has not reduced the number of pit bull terriers in this country, nor has it reduced the number of dog biting attacks while it has had a huge impact on the welfare of many dogs. It is essential that any new legislation is properly considered and puts greater emphasis on animal welfare whilst better protecting the public.”

The measures, part of proposed changes to the Dangerous Dogs Act, are aimed at tackling the growing problem of vicious animals being bred for use as weapons.
Ministers are also considering making it a criminal offence for a dog owner to allow their animal to be 'dangerously out of control.'

Currently they are only breaking the law if the dog is out of control in a public place. The change would extend the law to private residences, and could provide extra protection for postmen. There is also concern about the widespread use of dogs as weapons on inner city estates.

Home Secretary Alan Johnson said: "Britain is a nation of animal lovers, but people have a fundamental right to feel safe on the streets and in their homes.
"The vast majority of dog owners are responsible, but there is no doubt that some people breed and keep dogs for the sole purpose of intimidating others, in a sense using dogs as a weapon. It is this sort of behaviour that we will not tolerate; it is this sort of behaviour that we are determined to stop."

Figures uncovered by the Tories suggested 100 people every week are treated in hospital after being bitten by a dog. The number of cases has gone up to 3,079 in 1997-8 to 5,221 last year.

Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: "All we've really had for the past decade under this Government is a series of speeches and headline grabbing announcements about the things there were going to do to tackle problems like dangerous dog offences. But in the end nothing has ever happened. If Labour are re-elected in May all we'll get is the same tired-out old approach and none of the changes the country really needs."

But Billy Hayes, general secretary of the CWU, said: "This is a long-overdue, but extremely welcome step. We've been calling for changes to the law for several years now following some terrible dog attacks on postal workers. Many of our suggestions - including extending protection to private land and issuing control notices or 'dog Asbos' - are now fully reflected in this consultation."

London's deputy mayor Kit Malthouse described the proposals as "crackers," claiming the new rules would create a "DVLA for dogs."